seems incredible, yet still allow us to assimilate entire nations to their rulers. seems absurd, but despite the tens of thousands of conflict RESOLVED by emperors, popes, conquerors, presidents, generals (for the need to accumulate money or strategic interests) are not yet all (the whole of humanity, including leaders) agree because of the serious human principles which are stained.
It is not so much a question of "original sin" because fortunately we are not all equal and therefore not all equally rated s discrimination and individualism (nationalism) due to different culture, personality, sensitivity, gender.
Yes, generally, no doubt because the woman is certainly less "guilty" at least historically man (the world has been and continues to be under the aegis of men) and then by default, to a mere question "structural" ( general willingness to donate and / or maintain life , administration and just distribution of goods, the preservation of harmonious individual or collective failure to transform the violence in their repressed sex drive) and when this occurs is not attributable to a sort of "male emulation."
So if the "original sin" is not that of recognition of the EDA is guilty without doubt the first step to a real evolution, human self-critique at 360 degrees, which is expressed in self male (against women) or in that of adults (usually male against / lle boys and girls) or in that of all rulers, secular and not (to the people against the which were committed all possible crimes and atrocities worst ).
Only an admission of liability may be the categorical assertion of difference and the driving force to want to do things differently, to take a new road, without the risk of re-encountering the errors already committed.
Moreover, if this were true there would have been a changing of the guard in charge, although this would not happen.
(can you imagine or Qaddafi's successor Putin or an African warlord who abdicated in favor of a woman?)
What is really puzzling is that all this would not require it waste of money or any kind of effort, if not of interest in not only its citizens but of every human individual, a pure act of selfless love, or anything else that is not already prescribed in the sacred texts so dear.
seems unreal to read or watch the debates in which they assume positions clear and decidedly contrary to those of your opponent when you read of deaths, wars, massacres, mutilations, rapes.
seems ludicrous that anyone would worry about those that explode in the air as a small group organized it and remove from your imaginary white phosphorus-related deaths, the military bombardment, ordered by another small group competitor, as you can be sympathetic to a child who is killed or maimed just because Israeli or Palestinian?
still seems crazy to justify massacres of innocent people, or at least do not believe that this is not enough to stand against all those who in one way or another make possible every day.
seems incredible, however, we still can not each and everyone to judge a human being (male) or mechanically (for ordering them) run a massacre or another (always male), that the order if this happens in a ' that war optic continuiamo ad accettare come parte integrante delle nostre vite...anzi di quelle degli altri!
Sembra anacronistico ma abbiamo ancora l"immaturità" di lasciar correre, di dimenticare o di far finta di niente e chi invece sembra farsene carico lo fa in maniera faziosa, schierandosi da una parte o dall'altra, adducendo motivazioni tra le più variopinte (che spesso legittimano la trasformazione della vittima in carnefice); ciò nella migliore delle ipotesi, alternativamente si tratta unicamente dell'ennesima affermazione del proprio Io e niente più.
E così si perde di vista l'importante, l'essenziale, ciò che fa indignare e per cui val bene worthwhile to spend resources: injustice, discrimination, violence, deprivation of liberty.
And by virtue of a relation, which would make a great film that Chaplin's genius , that is pure demagoguery, pure formality, pretense or enslavement, we allow ourselves the luxury of recognition of the thinking of not having (or able) to interfere in matters of others, believing that "others" are those four murderers, fanatics, selfish, thinking that everything they do but really to resolve disputes in decades in which losers are those who do not own anything and decide that only wish that someone else (anyone else!) helped them to finally live in peace and freedom.
But all this, moreover, is the national policy strategies (individual): despot is a despot if opposed to alliances, if not conducive to the establishment of the moment or you do not have enough resources to be able to object, and a despot is responsible dead when it constitutes an impediment to the realization of their business and must be overthrown, it stops when in fact be shown to possess the minimum dose of diplomacy or "availability" assicuragli necessary to support the other principles.
seems incredible but it is reality.
0 comments:
Post a Comment