Denise Milani Foreclosure

ethical choices, fuel, Shell. W

few days ago, talking with a friend once again of what we can, we want, we need to do to the world in which we live, our ethical choices, decisions not to be taken, So do not buy products from (boycott) of politically incorrect companies, food choices and more, comes out, the usual, that if we were / really wanted to commit and make all our choices according to what practically not live!

I've made and I have heard very often these reasoning, but for me it's always like the first time.
I shot back to explain the reasons why I decided to use or not use, or buy or not buy a product, ever, so as not to give up on explaining the reasons that lead me to eat or not eat something that consider more scontatamente food / food.
After then it does not take long to realize that between the DO and DO NOT pass it an abyss, and that was not always able to give up everything, at any moment, under eco choices -ethical-compatible.
So I say that all are well s those who feel in their small, therefore undertake not to contribute to worsen totally unaware, minute by minute, the environment and living conditions surrounding that well is the smallest choice made in this direction, hoping of course that makes it next to a propellant other, possibly equally consistent.

The use of the car (the so-called machine) is one of the choices that much more than other involves a careful balancing and research (but not too much!) Over who gets (and how) and sell the fuel that you need to buy to feed them.
premise that anyone who wants to make choices that go in the direction of sostenibilità per il pianeta e tutti gli esseri viventi che vi dimorano non dovrebbe affatto acquistare ed utilizzare autovetture con motore a scoppio, essendo realisti non è difficile capire che, così come la maggior parte delle altre, una scelta di questo tipo preveda di solito una gradualità, per tutte le motivazioni di ordine pratico ad essa relative .

Perquanto, dunque, esistano delle differenze a tutt'oggi, tra i carburanti opzionabili che offrono la possibilità di dire/fare qualcosa "di meglio" , tuttavia pensare di scrollarsi di dosso, in maniera assoluta, la minima responsabilità al riguardo è semplicemente un'illusione, fino a che il carburante is burned in the air even if the LPG is preferable to gasoline and / or diesel fuel by almost total absence of emissions of substances such as sulfur, lead compounds, aromatic hydrocarbons, is also a byproduct of oil (hence the name) .
Far different is the speech for the methane (although be widely seen in the same way as the GPL) which is also a fuel that powers an internal combustion engine, thus providing combusion, resulting dioxide emission carbon and so on.

very interesting (even when "off-topic" than what you're looking at here, but importante per poter fare le scelte più giuste) l'articolo su questo blog postato il 22 settembre 2009 in merito al disastro verso il quale il mercato del greggio ci sta portando e quest'altro sulla questione del Picco.

Tutto ciò premesso è chiaro che scegliere quanto più eticamente possibile un "marchio" di combustibile fossile è come scegliere la marca di sigarette meno nociva al nostro organismo.

Ad ogni modo, oltre alle scelte individuali ci sono anche questioni ben più gravi, nel senso che riguardano veri e propri abusi e sfruttamenti di ogni genere ad opera delle multinazionali del petrolio, vere e proprie colonizzatrici imperialiste senza scrupoli di terre e popolazioni (umane e non); fatti così evidentemente eclatanti che le vicende in cui è coinvolto il primo ministro italiano sembrano quasi barzellette al confronto!

Il caso di Shell e Agip in Nigeria è l'esempio più calzante (anche se non il solo, ovviamente).

Report ha dedicato alla faccenda una puntata , Amnesty International ha una campagna aperta e un dettagliato rapporto che mira a denunciare violazioni di diritti umani; così come possiamo trovare in rete articoli attenti e dettagliati in merito , sottolineando anche responsabilità dello stesso governo italiano e chi sollecita risposte urgent.

To my surprise I discover that yesterday in my inbox had a new message (which I promptly shared ) sent me a box of Shell aliases and in writing and signed by the alleged head of nientepopodimenoché International Relations of Shell in Nigeria.
Clearly this is a response according to these gentlemen "duty" to the request of Amnesty International, Amnesty is concerned about the same forward and run all of their members / supporters.

So, contrary to what emerges from the investigation of reports or the Guardian or Indymedia , all non-profit organizations that make these battles, the only reason the business value, as always, it seems rather that, through the use of the actions of so-called terrorists / pirates and abstract entities such as strakeholders (compared to most beneficial charities!), Shell itself is (now?) very interested in the development of Nigeria and is very attentive to all social and environmental problems of the country.

is once again to draw a parallel with the exploits of the crafty and furbettini the district and the city, thanks to the accumulated capital in an illegal and immoral for years, can afford not to pay a fair price for their actions, spending fortunes in criminal cases, law firms and consultants unscrupulous people who sell the most dear to them rather than lose cases for his clients.

Our thoughts are inevitably going to Ken Saro-Wiwa and all those who struggle daily to demand their rights, those of living beings and the earth in which they live and they were born.