La tendenza più diffusa dell'essere umano (principalmente maschio e occidentale) is to let go (so to favor) to what the consumer society (ie the set of a few other human beings organized to be able to make the most profit possible in the shortest possible time screwing around and all / i) propina daily basis: eat, more, more. doing so he is not the only medium that distinguishes it from all other living beings "sentient": criticism, so the opportunity to rebel against any more or less subliminal command to begin to behave more in line with their own ideas with his own ethics (of course if and when these issues do least part of the baggage equipment).
commandment consumption makes us slaves to the apparent satisfaction of our desires, we approve standards that are very high in the hierarchy of knowledge levels, the stadium more superficial than the one which is not covered (and covered) a different view, the possibility, however slight, of a change (however slight) to route from the direction taken unknowingly.
level down, going deeper and deeper, you discover that the individual puts in place a series of defense mechanisms of the apparent satisfaction of those desires, in a more or less vigorous, depending on level, "capacity" of that question in that baggage and starting already mentioned.
has already been discussed in this blog NATURE , has never been addressed, however, never for "meaning" (though we have dealt with the taste) senses are fallible, always as are the interfaces between "the inside of us .. and all the rest, which allows us to say that we are what surrounds us and / or vice versa, which allows the theory of images and holistic view of all reality (and therefore also human) senses something is very "strong," very "ground" because it conveyed dalla nostra razionalità, non filtrati dalla nostra mente.
E' dunque molto difficile riuscire a capire realmente ciò di cui abbiamo bisogno basandoci unicamente su di essi; noi esseri umani, soprattutto a tutt'oggi, abbiamo la necessità vitale (e entro brevissimo termine!) di riuscire a capire cosa dobbiamo lasciare, a cosa dobbiamo rinunciare (pur continuando ad essere felici), e soprattutto perché.
Se non abbiamo un ritorno che compensi la rinuncia ci teniamo tutto; per noi essere é avere (alla faccia di Fromm e delle filosofie orientali!) e questo é innegabilmente sempre più vero!
L'avere é il possedere cose, oggetti, cibi, che ci permettono di bring tastes, smells, textures, colors, shapes, without any reason, dictated only by the apparent contentment and only sensory completely bypass the whole outline is, indeed, the only think, sometimes, make our decisions less "natural" and us further away from our beloved origins.
So, we challenge ourselves, our origins, our instincts more simple and narrow-minded, get rid of the shell that has been with us when we arrived, we think it is possible and desirable to go in the opposite direction, even without trauma, without disabilities net that are not necessary.
We try to strive for something that is simply not possible, we do not believe that to what seems impossible is a waste of time because infruttoso and / or counter-productive, is exactly the opposite.
is seeking the impossible, that man has ever made possible. Those who have wisely limited to what appeared to them as possible, have never advanced a single step.
[Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin]
level down, going deeper and deeper, you discover that the individual puts in place a series of defense mechanisms of the apparent satisfaction of those desires, in a more or less vigorous, depending on level, "capacity" of that question in that baggage and starting already mentioned.
has already been discussed in this blog NATURE , has never been addressed, however, never for "meaning" (though we have dealt with the taste) senses are fallible, always as are the interfaces between "the inside of us .. and all the rest, which allows us to say that we are what surrounds us and / or vice versa, which allows the theory of images and holistic view of all reality (and therefore also human) senses something is very "strong," very "ground" because it conveyed dalla nostra razionalità, non filtrati dalla nostra mente.
E' dunque molto difficile riuscire a capire realmente ciò di cui abbiamo bisogno basandoci unicamente su di essi; noi esseri umani, soprattutto a tutt'oggi, abbiamo la necessità vitale (e entro brevissimo termine!) di riuscire a capire cosa dobbiamo lasciare, a cosa dobbiamo rinunciare (pur continuando ad essere felici), e soprattutto perché.
Se non abbiamo un ritorno che compensi la rinuncia ci teniamo tutto; per noi essere é avere (alla faccia di Fromm e delle filosofie orientali!) e questo é innegabilmente sempre più vero!
L'avere é il possedere cose, oggetti, cibi, che ci permettono di bring tastes, smells, textures, colors, shapes, without any reason, dictated only by the apparent contentment and only sensory completely bypass the whole outline is, indeed, the only think, sometimes, make our decisions less "natural" and us further away from our beloved origins.
So, we challenge ourselves, our origins, our instincts more simple and narrow-minded, get rid of the shell that has been with us when we arrived, we think it is possible and desirable to go in the opposite direction, even without trauma, without disabilities net that are not necessary.
We try to strive for something that is simply not possible, we do not believe that to what seems impossible is a waste of time because infruttoso and / or counter-productive, is exactly the opposite.
is seeking the impossible, that man has ever made possible. Those who have wisely limited to what appeared to them as possible, have never advanced a single step.
[Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin]
0 comments:
Post a Comment