What they all agree, and anti-Italian conspiracy theorists, is that the world is certainly not governed by those who says he should do it or (the politicians) on behalf of persons (citizens). plots create figures of all kinds, every day different, that identify how the leaders of all hidden and anticomplottisti entity shall use almost abstract, ethereal (the "market", for example, or "nature") that seems to have nothing to do and see with humans, che, secondo loro, si limitano ad osservare da lontano quanto accada.
Insomma, chi in un modo, chi in un altro, ognuno é convinto di vivere una vita da suddito impotente su questa terra, condizione a cui, tuttavia, i complottisti non si rassegnano, gli altri pare invece di si, quasi che fosse un male inevitabile; potrebbe essere che questa differenza dipenda in gran parte dai diversi "stati mentali" (o disposizione d'animo) dei due gruppi in questione : i complottisti(e/o i dietrologi) vorrebbero avvisare tutte e tutti che viviamo appesi a fili invisibili che vengono mossi quotidianamente pressocché in ogni ambito della nostra vita, dunque partono dall'assunto che gli esseri umani non abbiano la benché minima consapevolezza of reality and that everything is driven to make art, "others", believing instead that they are well aware (and it's possible that everyone can easily become, using logic, science and rationality) of the mechanisms known as inevitable, they feel ready to accept tacitly (or almost) than is the case, a pure logic underlying fatalistic. Looking at the reality, the company said it is undeniable that there are human beings who are undoubtedly much more power than most of the people and that, because of what they are capable of driving "things" to your liking, according to a particular advantage (this non vuol dire che lo facciano sempre e comunque, tout court); e certamente queste persone non sono i politici i quali, spesso, non sanno neppure ciò che realmente c'é dietro a dinamiche e meccanismi di cui ingorano il più delle volte quasi tutto.
Non é una novità che i grandi magnati della finanza, i banchieri, coloro che sono a capo di lobby o imprese gigantesche abbiano interesse affinché determinate scelte vengano fatte nelle direzione dell'agevolazione dei propri affari per poter macinare sempre più profitti alla faccia di tutti gli altri.
La considerazione + ovvia che viene da fare é che debba esistere una regola soprattuto per "loro" e che si debba in primis regolamentare questo potere (il più delle times resulting from too much freedom of action in each direction) by reducing it as much as possible (instead of doing as it is done in Italy in particular) in order to be able to guarantee a maximum degree of freedom (or tending to it) to as many people as possible, especially in those who have not "behind" anything that Grant them at least a basic immunity.
past history and present, psychology Teach us that it is an indisputable fact: the human being is their own interests and mind only to their own advantage (besides, why use laws were not so?), So who is authorized to accumulate thanks to liberal policies, and capitalist neotali will do more, they are already versed in a spiral that is not possible to go backwards.
So the simple equation is valid all right: + money + power = money, and then + + + Power = chance to use them (both) for their best.
The mechanisms that regulate the maintenance of economic empires both + are thin and delicate as they are extensive and complex, so to be able to keep them alive we will need "to do" in one way or another, and the freedom of others is certainly not a matter in quite the opposite.
And then, without the network really become a battlefield as defined by global someone rightly in which alternate forms but not the substance, it is time to redesign this space still free, or rather an "honor" and honor the truth, even managing to send deserve where those who care only of denigrating and denying the troubling evidence of facts.
0 comments:
Post a Comment